<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NLP Meta Programs: What Are They?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldofnlp.com/nlp-meta-programs-what-are-they/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldofnlp.com/nlp-meta-programs-what-are-they/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Frandsen</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofnlp.com/nlp-meta-programs-what-are-they/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Frandsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofnlp.com/?p=41#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Dear Stuart

You are right. In many cases the two-dimentional preference model makes sens. And it is practical when you want to know about a persons probability for a certin behaviour in a given situation.

I am however trying to look into other possible models
to get a better understanding of how metaprograms work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stuart</p>
<p>You are right. In many cases the two-dimentional preference model makes sens. And it is practical when you want to know about a persons probability for a certin behaviour in a given situation.</p>
<p>I am however trying to look into other possible models<br />
to get a better understanding of how metaprograms work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofnlp.com/nlp-meta-programs-what-are-they/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofnlp.com/?p=41#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Hey Erik,

Yes, the concepts behind the Psychological Types are not exactly the same, but Meta Programs do have a similar basis in the idea of preference. In other words, that&#039;s how one might actually come up with a dichotomy to check a preference - that a person might prefer one thing or another.

If you have a way to assess a person&#039;s preferences across more than 2 dimensions, I&#039;m sure that will be helpful, though I fear it may not be as easy to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Erik,</p>
<p>Yes, the concepts behind the Psychological Types are not exactly the same, but Meta Programs do have a similar basis in the idea of preference. In other words, that&#8217;s how one might actually come up with a dichotomy to check a preference &#8211; that a person might prefer one thing or another.</p>
<p>If you have a way to assess a person&#8217;s preferences across more than 2 dimensions, I&#8217;m sure that will be helpful, though I fear it may not be as easy to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Frandsen</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofnlp.com/nlp-meta-programs-what-are-they/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Frandsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofnlp.com/?p=41#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hi Stuart
I wish it was so simple.
If you trace back MBTI to Jung and even further back to Freud you will see that the conceptual world behind MBTI is substantially different from the concept of Meta Programs.
Anyway my question is not concerning the historic background on which Meta Programs developed, rather it concerns if it make sense to work with a bipolar model for a phenomenon that is clearly not of a bipolar nature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stuart<br />
I wish it was so simple.<br />
If you trace back MBTI to Jung and even further back to Freud you will see that the conceptual world behind MBTI is substantially different from the concept of Meta Programs.<br />
Anyway my question is not concerning the historic background on which Meta Programs developed, rather it concerns if it make sense to work with a bipolar model for a phenomenon that is clearly not of a bipolar nature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Frandsen</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofnlp.com/nlp-meta-programs-what-are-they/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Frandsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofnlp.com/?p=41#comment-42</guid>
		<description>The model for Metaprograms in NLP is bipolar:
eg. Towards  - Away from
It seems logical and resonable.
But people are not logical and resonable.

I think that people can at the same time be attracted to something and try to avoid it?

I think another model for the metaprograms could help to beter understand metaprograms, and thereby also increase the possibility for working with them and change them if that is what we want.
I am working on an other model and would like to hear comments on the subject.

STUART says:
Hi Erik,
Meta Programs are on seperate dichotomies, and a based on the concepts within the MBTI. They are both preference tools. Depending on the state within the environment in which people are in, people prefer something by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The model for Metaprograms in NLP is bipolar:<br />
eg. Towards  &#8211; Away from<br />
It seems logical and resonable.<br />
But people are not logical and resonable.</p>
<p>I think that people can at the same time be attracted to something and try to avoid it?</p>
<p>I think another model for the metaprograms could help to beter understand metaprograms, and thereby also increase the possibility for working with them and change them if that is what we want.<br />
I am working on an other model and would like to hear comments on the subject.</p>
<p>STUART says:<br />
Hi Erik,<br />
Meta Programs are on seperate dichotomies, and a based on the concepts within the MBTI. They are both preference tools. Depending on the state within the environment in which people are in, people prefer something by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learn NLP Meta Model from Free eBook and Resources</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofnlp.com/nlp-meta-programs-what-are-they/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Learn NLP Meta Model from Free eBook and Resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofnlp.com/?p=41#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] Meta-Model: 10 Tips for greater effectiveness (Part 2) Neurolinguistic Programming: The Meta Model NLP Meta Programs: What Are They? Meta Modelling The NLP Meta Model Milton Model Of NLP Neuro Linguistic Programming: The Milton [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meta-Model: 10 Tips for greater effectiveness (Part 2) Neurolinguistic Programming: The Meta Model NLP Meta Programs: What Are They? Meta Modelling The NLP Meta Model Milton Model Of NLP Neuro Linguistic Programming: The Milton [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

